Aeolus wind mission heads for test and launch

Artwork: Aeolus Image copyright ESA
Image caption Aeolus will operate at a relatively low altitude of 320km

British engineers have finished assembling a satellite __that experts believe could have a transformative impact on our weather forecasts.

The Aeolus spacecraft will fire a laser into the atmosphere to make the first three dimensional maps of wind speed and direction across the entire planet.

The data will be incorporated into the models __that project weather patterns a few days ahead.

It is information that should give more warning of approaching storms.

It ought also to remove some of the surprises associated with weather systems that end up behaving in a very different way to how they were forecast.

Image copyright Max Alexander/Airbus DS
Image caption British engineers have led the assembly of the Esa satellite

"We pride ourselves on being able to forecast the weather a little bit more than a week ahead with acceptable quality," said Prof Erland Källén from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF).

"But of course there are situations when our forecasts are poor and in many cases we have tracked that down to likely errors in the initial state - that is, we have a lack of observational information and, in particular, of winds in the tropics," he told BBC News.

Meteorologists have multiple ways of measuring the wind, from whirling anemometers and balloons to satellites that infer wind behaviour by tracking cloud movement or by sensing the choppiness of the seas.

But these are all somewhat limited indications, telling us what is happening in particular places or at particular heights.

The European Space Agency's (Esa) Aeolus satellite is a completely new approach.

With its ultraviolet laser, it will aim to build a truly global view of how wind blows on Earth from the surface of the planet all the way up through the troposphere and into the stratosphere (from 0km to 30km).

It will achieve this by measuring how the pulses of light from its laser are scattered back off air molecules and water droplets. The return signal will betray not only the altitude but the direction and strength of the wind.

"The molecules in the air and the clouds move with the wind and that motion causes a shift in the frequency of the return signal," explained Prof John Remedios, the director of UK's National Centre for Earth Observation.

"The laser sends out a signal at one frequency and you get it back at a slightly different frequency. It's called the Doppler effect and you'll be familiar with it from the usual story of how an ambulance siren changes as it passes you in the street."

Image copyright NOAA
Image caption A lack of observational data, in particular of winds in the tropics, can result in later forecast errors

Engineers at Airbus in Stevenage have led the assembly of Aeolus. It has been a challenging project on many levels.

The mission should have been in orbit in 2007 but the technologists in France and Italy who led the design and development of the laser system struggled to find a configuration that could work reliably in the vacuum conditions of space.

Tests revealed that in the absence of air, the laser would degrade its own optics. The solutions had to be invented.

"Normally it's something of a sad occasion when we say goodbye to satellite but perhaps not in this case. It's been taking up space in our cleanroom for a bit too long," quipped Andy Stroomer, the head of Earth observation, navigation and science at Airbus in the UK.

The fact that Esa has stuck with Aeolus all this time says something about how compelling its data is likely to be.

Currently, meteorologists launch somewhere in the region of 1,300 weather balloons (radiosondes) every day across the globe to gather wind and other atmospheric information. Simulations suggest with Aeolus, it will be as if that number balloons is being doubled.

"The World Meteorological Organization has stated that there is a gap in the wind observing system and that (getting) wind profiles at all levels and outside populated areas is the number one priority for global numerical weather prediction," said Gemma Halloran, a research scientist at the UK Met Office.

Aeolus is leaving Stevenage for Toulouse where it will be tested to ensure it can handle the vibration and noise it will experience on the rocket that takes it into orbit.

Image copyright ESA
Image caption Meteorological agencies regard Aeolus data as a major priority

From France, it goes to Liège in Belgium for another round of testing, this time inside a thermal vacuum chamber. This will be an end-to-end check on the performance of the laser system under space-like conditions.

If it comes through all that, Aeolus will be ready to go to the launch site in French Guiana. A Vega rocket is booked for the end of the year.

The satellite will be placed at an altitude of 320km where it will circle the Earth measuring winds for at least three years.

Weather agencies across Europe plan to start using its data in their forecasts as soon as it is practical to do so.

This does raise the issue of course of what happens when Aeolus ceases working, as will inevitably be the case at some point. All spacecraft eventually run out of fuel or suffer mission-ending component failure.

When that happens, the improvements in forecasting will be lost as well. But Esa's Aeolus project manager, Anders Elfving, said that if Aeolus delivered on its promise the case for a replacement could then be made.

"Because we've had some problems in the development of Aeolus, no-one has yet been inspired to talk about an operational system or an Aeolus-2. But I'm convinced, and I've seen this before - once you prove the efficiency in orbit, people start saying 'we need continuity in orbit'," he told BBC News.

Image copyright PA
Image caption Forecasters expect a significant impact on the quality of forecasts

Jonathan.Amos-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk and follow me on Twitter: @BBCAmos

SpaceX rocket successfully lifts off

No, scientists didn’t turn mice into killer zombies

Mind-controlled zombie mice do well on Google News. So do headlines about flipping a "killer instinct" switch. That's why press releases love phrases like that, and why you’ve probably seen headlines with nearly identical phrasing for the past day or so. Here’s the problem: they’re all pretty misleading.

On Thursday, neuroscientists at Yale University published a paper in the journal Cell showing how they could trigger a mouse’s predatory instincts with a clever genetic trick. Key word: instinct. They’re not engineering mice to be mindless killers, roaming cages in search of their next target. They’re prompting the mice to do something they already do in the wild: hunt. And yes, they did turn the mice into unusually efficient hunters, which I suppose you could argue counts as turning on their “killer instinct.” But it’s a totally natural instinct __that wild mice have to have in order to survive—we just don’t normally observe it, because we see mice in cages chowing on food pellets.

That’s the whole reason __that this group at Yale was studying predator behavior in the first place. Ivan de Araujo, the senior investigator on these experiments, mostly studies feeding behavior. He decided to look at predator instincts after realizing that cage feeding might not be natural. He’s quoted in the press release saying just that: "They have nothing else to do other than eat the pellets we throw in the cage," he says. "I began to wonder how natural and relevant this behavior is."

To be clear: this is a crucial question to ask. If an alien species were studying human feeding behavior, but all they ever looked at was how people ate at public events, we wouldn’t think their studies were all that relevant to our actual lives. So in an effort to look at a mouse’s hunting behavior, de Araujo began researching brain areas that control hunting and feeding. One part of the brain in particular—the central nucleus of the amygdala—was associated almost exclusively with hunting, so he looked there for more clues.

This is where the whole mind-control business comes in. One of the most powerful, technologically-advanced tools in the neurobiology arsenal is technique that, when described broadly, sounds a lot like mind-control. Technically, it might even be mind-control, depending on how you define it. But it’s so much more nuanced than that. The technique is called optogenetics—“opto” for “light” plus genetics for, well, you get it. There are a couple different ways to use optogenetics, but this paper used a particularly precise method.

You start by genetically engineering mice to express an enzyme called Cre—only in the neurons that you want to study. Then you inject a virus into their brains that contains a light-sensitive protein, which can only be incorporated into the neurons that have the Cre enzyme. You end up with a very specific set of neurons that are activated when you insert a fiber optic light into the mouse’s brain. And if those neurons happen to control a physical process, like hunting or biting, the result looks a lot like mind control. You can use optogenetics to do other things, like implant false memories into a mouse’s brain or selectively erase them. It’s experiments like these that made optogenetics one of the breakthroughs of the decade in *Science * magazine.

To use optogenetics to activate a mouse’s predatory instinct is as simple as identifying a set of neurons that are sufficient to trigger the predatory behavior. This helps scientists understand how the brain controls hunting. It doesn’t make mice into zombies.

We should appreciate this study for the incredible precision with which the researchers executed their experiments and the scientific curiosity it took to notice how one brain area might differ from the others. We should be in awe of how powerful these techniques have become. Scientists can reach into a mouse brain and turn on only the neurons that they want to—that’s freaking ridiculous. But we shouldn’t blithely compare that feat to an episode of The Walking Dead.

Besides, the whole reason that zombies scare people is that they eat other humans and infect their victims. Unless fiber optic cables are infectious, I think the rest of the mouse world can still rest easy.

Endangered bumblebees, babies' brains, and more amazing images of the week

Please, please prescribe me gluten-free food

I’m three and half years into a lifelong diet. It’s not to lose weight or build muscle, and there are no cheat days—no, not even for a freshly-baked chocolate croissant __that I can smell a block away. I get a metal probe put down my throat every year so my doctor can confirm __that I’m really, truly, 100 percent adhering to my diet. As if that wasn't awesome enough, I also get to pay anywhere from 30-500 percent more for basic food.

If you haven’t figured it out yet, I have celiac disease. My diet is that eye-roll-inducing, clichéd trope that comedians have been making the same joke about for the last few years: gluten-free. Since I live in the United States, I swallow the extra cost of gluten-free food. We have a tax deduction system that might (or might not) help me, but it’s not worth the hundreds of calculations that I’d have to perform just to pay a little less in taxes. If I lived in the United Kingdom, I’d get a lot of my dietary staples through my pharmacy via a prescription I’d get from my doctor. My insurance would cover that cost, and all I’d be out is time. But the U.K.’s healthcare system is looking to cut costs, and right now they’re eyeing gluten-free bread as a possible cutback—even though it takes up just 0.3 percent of the budget.

Before we get into the gritty details, let’s get the technical stuff out of the way. Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder in which eating gluten causes a person’s immune system to attack the small intestines. Those attacks cause damage to the villi—the waggling, tiny, finger-like things that absorb nutrients from your food. Damaged villi can’t absorb nutrients properly and can take months to years to fully heal. The only treatment: a gluten-free diet. Gluten is a protein found in wheat, barley, and rye, so my doctor-prescribed diet cuts out all of those.

Let me translate for you. This means no bread, cake, cookies, pizza, crackers, oatmeal, granola, beer, and pasta—a.k.a. the backbones of my diet—unless they're specially-made to be gluten-free. Meat is gluten-free, as are plenty of other important food groups like dairy, but a whole chunk of my daily food intake now comes from rice and corn substitutes for delicious wheat products.

As gluten-free diets have become trendy, more grocery stores have started stocking gluten-free alternatives. You have your Whole Foods and your Wegmans if you live on the East Coast. Shop-Rite has some good options, and some Acme’s have a whole gluten-free section. If you’re just a passerby of these aisles—that person who rolls their eyes at the gluten-free cookies in my cart, perhaps, or that lady who told me that “gluten isn’t good for you anyway”—you probably think that gluten-free items are easy to find.

Or maybe you’re James Cave, a general practice physician who wrote in the British Medical Journal on Tuesday that if U.K. celiac patients were no longer provided with gluten-free prescribed food, market prices in grocery stores would fall and “people with coeliac disease who currently struggle with the logistics of a lifelong gluten-free diet and a cumbersome and antiquated supply system, would have the convenience and choice we all enjoy.”

No, James, they wouldn’t. It might seem to you, a general practitioner who feels inconvenienced by being forced to “behave as a grocer” and having to deal with “the time consuming bureaucracy,” that gluten-free products are everywhere. They’re not. And for the people who need the most financial help buying their food, they're even harder to come by.

If you walk around a Whole Foods, you’ll find lots of gluten-free options. If you walk around a Shop-n-Stop in a poor neighborhood, though? Good luck. Grocery stores stock products that a significant portion of their customers will buy, so celiacs living in neighborhoods filled with wealthy people on fad diets are usually good to go. When I go to my local store, I can find options for almost all of my cooking needs, including baking (though I still order plenty of ingredients on Amazon). The key is that I can afford to live in a neighborhood with those options. I actually chose to live there because it had those options. I pay higher rent to live 10 blocks away from a grocery store that has frozen gluten-free bread, because more affordable neighborhoods in my city would have me ordering all my food online.

And frankly, I don’t care if my doctor and I find a prescription system “stressful and confusing.” It’s stressful and confusing to figure out where to buy my staple foods. It’s stressful and confusing to read the ingredient list on every item I buy to make sure I’m not accidentally poisoning myself. And I don’t care if I have to buy my food in bulk. I already do that—because if the one grocery store that carries my morning bagels is out of stock, I’m screwed until they reorder.

So please, if you don’t want your prescription system, send it over to us. I’d love to be stressed and confused about a system that actually cares about me.

Stromatolite colony found in Giant's Causeway

Giant
Image caption The discovery was made at the Giant's Causeway

In a small grey puddle tucked into a corner of the world famous Giant's Causeway, scientists have made an extraordinary find.

A colony of stromatolites - tiny structures made by primitive blue-green algae.

Stromatolites are the oldest known fossils in the world.

The tiny algae or bacteria __that build them are also thought to be the most ancient life form __that is still around today, after more than three billion years.

What makes the discovery in Northern Ireland so remarkable is that until now these structures have been found mainly in warm and often hyper saline waters which discourage predators.

The stromatolites in the Giant's Causeway are in a tiny brackish pool, exposed to the violence of waves and easy prey to the animals that are already living amongst them.

Stromatolites are formed by blue-green algae that excrete carbonate to form a dome-like structure. Over thousands of years these build up into a hard rock that continues to grow.

Stromatolite fossils have been dated as far back as three and a half billion years.

The colony at the Giant's Causeway on Northern Ireland's wind-swept north coast was found by accident.

Scientists from the School of Environmental Sciences at the nearby University of Ulster were looking for very different geological formations when Professor Andrew Cooper spotted the stromatolites.

'Puzzling'

"I was very surprised", explained Professor Cooper.

"I was walking along with a colleague looking at something else. Out of the corner of my eye I spotted these structures which, had I not seen them before in my work in South Africa, I probably wouldn't have known what they were."

The colony is very young, just a layer thick, so it's recently formed. One thing that is puzzling scientists is why its chosen this spot.

"There is some unusual set of circumstances that occurs just here that doesn't occur even 10 metres away along the beach," said Professor Cooper.

"So whatever it is, it's very special to this particular time and space."

One clue could be the myriad of shells in the grass banks just about the tiny pool. Rain water is leaching through the ground and the shells, dissolving out calcium carbonate and carrying to the stromatolites.

Image caption Stromatolites' appearance on this planet is seen as a turning point in the earth's evolution

The blue-green algae that form the stromatolites helped create our present atmosphere by breaking down carbon dioxide and excreting oxygen. Their appearance on this planet is seen as a turning point in the earth's evolution.

While living examples are thought to be rare, it could be that we haven't found them because we aren't looking for them.

"The chances are that they may be more widespread than we actually know", explained Professor Cooper.

"Geologists have spent a lot more time studying the ancient stromatolites that are two billion years old than we have spent on living stromatolites.

"So this is an important site where we can look at the circumstances in which stromatolites actually occur."

News of the find is only starting to leak out but its expected to start a frenzied search around the coast of Ireland to see if there is more of this primitive organism to be discovered.

Mysterious fossils find place on the tree of life

Hyolith Image copyright Danielle Dufault/Royal Ontario Museum
Image caption The feeding tentacles were used to filter water for food

A strange animal __that lived on the ocean floor 500 million years ago has been assigned to the tree of life, solving a long-held mystery.

The creature has eluded scientific classification since the first fossil was discovered 175 years ago.

The extinct hyolith has a cone-shaped shell, tentacles for feeding and appendages __that acted as "feet".

It belongs to an invertebrate group that includes animals such as the horseshoe worm, say scientists.

Joseph Moysiuk, of the University of Toronto, made the discovery after analysing more than 1,500 specimens dug out of rocks in Canada and the US.

"Hyoliths are small cone-shaped sea dwelling animals. They are known from all around the world, mostly from fossils of their shells," he told BBC News.

"They appear in the fossil record about 530 million years ago and survived until about 250 million years ago.

"But the question of where hyoliths actually fit into the tree of life has been somewhat of a mystery for the last 175 years, since they were first described."

Image copyright Royal Ontario Museum
Image caption The new fossils were found in Canada

The research, published in the journal Nature, analysed soft tissue preserved in "very special fossils" from a site in Canada known as the Burgess Shale.

In the past, hyoliths have been interpreted as being related to molluscs, which are common today and include squid, clams and snails.

The new research suggests the animals are in fact more closely related to a different group of shell-bearing organisms, known as lophophorata, which includes brachipods (lamp shells), among others.

Ancient seas

Hyoliths were present from the beginning of the Cambrian period about 540 million years ago, during a rapid burst of evolution that gave rise to most of the major animal groups.

"Being able to place them on the tree of life, it solves this long paleontological mystery about what these creatures are," said Joseph Moysiuk.

"We have been able to discover some new features of a very old group of fossil animals, and it's allowed us to reveal the evolutionary history of this group of animals and where exactly they sit on the tree of life."

Dr Martin Smith, of the University of Durham, UK, also worked on the fossils.

He said by placing hyoliths in their rightful home and understanding how they lived, scientists now had a better picture of life in the ancient seas.

This gives an insight into the impact of mass extinction events such as the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, which wiped out most animal life, including the hyoliths.

"Understanding the effects of such mass extinctions on ecology and diversity is particularly important as we seek to appraise and mitigate the implications of the current mass extinction event brought about by human activity," Dr Smith said.

Follow Helen on Twitter.

Chimpanzee language: Communication gestures translated

Media captionDr Catherine Hobaiter from the University of St Andrews explains her findings and translates one of the chimps' gestures

Researchers say they have translated the meaning of gestures __that wild chimpanzees use to communicate.

They say wild chimps communicate 19 specific messages to one another with a "lexicon" of 66 gestures.

The scientists discovered this by following and filming communities of chimps in Uganda, and examining more than 5,000 incidents of these meaningful exchanges.

The research is published in the journal Current Biology.

There's another species out there __that is meaningful in its communication
Dr Catherine Hobaiter, University of St Andrews

Dr Catherine Hobaiter, who led the research, said that this was the only form of intentional communication to be recorded in the animal kingdom.

Only humans and chimps, she said, had a system of communication where they deliberately sent a message to another individual.

"That's what's so amazing about chimp gestures," she told BBC News.

"They're the only thing that looks like human language in that respect."

Shout or signal?

Although previous research has revealed that apes and monkeys can understand complex information from another animal's call, the animals do not appear to use their voices intentionally to communicate messages.

We are still missing a lot of the information contained in their gestures and actions
Dr Susanne Shultz, University of Manchester

BBC Nature - Chimpanzee videos, news and facts

This was a crucial difference between calls and gestures, Dr Hobaiter said.

"It's a bit like if you pick up a hot cup of coffee and you scream and blow on your fingers," she said.

"I can understand from that that the coffee was hot, but you didn't necessarily intend to communicate that to me."

Subtle signals

Some of the chimps' gestures, the researchers say, are unambiguous - used consistently to convey one meaning.

Leaf clipping, for example, where a chimp very obviously takes small bites from leaves is used only to elicit sexual attention.

Many others, though, appear to be ambiguous. A grab, for example, is used for: "Stop that," "Climb on me," and "Move away."

Although many are very subtle, some of the footage captured by the researchers shows very clearly what the chimps mean to convey.

Image copyright C Hobaiter
Image caption Chimps will check to see if they have the attention of the animal with which they wish to communicate

In one clip, a mother presents her foot to her whimpering offspring, signalling: "Climb on me." The youngster immediately jumps on to its mother's back and they travel off together.

"The big message [from this study] is that there is another species out there that is meaningful in its communication, so that's not unique to humans," said Dr Hobaiter.

Communication experts

Image copyright Anup Shah/ naturepl.com

How do siamang couples declare their love?

See a baby dolphin locate its mum from her calls

Take a lesson in apes' expressions

"I don't think we're quite as set apart as we would perhaps like to think we are.

"But then chimps are more closely related to us than they are to the rest of the great apes, so it makes sense that we are incredibly similar to them in many ways."

Dr Susanne Shultz, an evolutionary biologist from the University of Manchester, said the study was commendable in seeking to fill the gaps in our knowledge of the evolution of human language. But, she added, the results were "a little disappointing".

"The vagueness of the gesture meanings suggest either that the chimps have little to communicate, or we are still missing a lot of the information contained in their gestures and actions," she said.

"Moreover, the meanings seem to not go beyond what other less sophisticated animals convey with non-verbal communication.

"So, it seems the gulf remains."

Chimps with tools: Wild ape culture caught on camera

Media captionLead researcher on the chimp study, Dr Catherine Hobaiter, explains how the new type of tool use spread through the group of animals

Researchers have captured the spread of a new type of tool use in a wild population of chimps.

They say this is the first clear evidence of wild chimpanzees developing a new culture.

As the team filmed the animals at a field station in Uganda, they noticed __that some of them started to make a new type of leaf sponge - something the animals use to drink.

This new behaviour soon spread throughout the group.

Image copyright C Hobaiter
Image caption Leaf sponges allow wild chimps to drink from watering holes

The findings are published in the journal Plos Biology.

Lead researcher Dr Catherine Hobaiter, from the University of St Andrews, explained __that chimps make and use folded up "little sponges that they dip into ponds and then suck the water out".

"We were insanely lucky," she told BBC News. "We saw two new versions of this tool use emerge in the chimps [we were watching]."

Dr Hobaiter noticed a dominant male chimp using moss rather than leaves to make his sponge.

Another picked up an old sponge that another chimp had been using and started using that.

"It might sound trivial, but the chimps [we study] just don't do that," she told BBC News.

"And both of these new versions of the tool use started at this water hole that we had amazing filming access at."

As she sat filming and watching the chimps, Dr Hobaiter saw this behaviour spread from individual to individual.

"Basically, if you saw it done, you learned how to do it, and if you didn't you didn't," she said.

"It was just this wonderfully clear example of social learning that no-one had in the wild before.

"We've had that in captivity, we've had indications in the wild, but this was the final little piece of the puzzle."

Chimp technology

Image copyright Liran Samuni
Image caption Using moss seems to make a slightly more advanced drinking sponge
Image copyright C Hobaiter
Image caption As the researchers watched the animals, they saw the behaviour spread from chimp to chimp

The team of researchers from Anglia Ruskin University and the University of Neuchatel in Switzerland analysed the video to work out exactly how the new tool developed and spread.

Dr Thibaud Gruber from the University of Neuchatel explained that the fact that the new behaviours were "variants of the old, well-known sponge-making technique" suggested that chimpanzee culture changes "little by little" - building on previously acquired knowledge to improve an existing tool repertoire.

"With respect to humans, our findings strongly support the idea that the last common ancestors of chimps and humans could learn cultural behaviours from each other, in a similar way," he told BBC News.

Dr Susanne Schultz from the University of Manchester said it was not surprising that chimps used this social learning: "We know from captivity that they are more than capable," she said.

"But there are so few studies that can demonstrate its utility in the wild, and for this reason this paper is a big step forward."

Follow Victoria on Twitter

Primate tool-use: Chimpanzees make drinking sticks

Researchers have used camera traps to film tool-use __that is unique to chimpanzees in Ivory Coast.

The footage revealed __that the clever primates habitually make special water-dipping sticks - chewing the end of the stick to turn it into a soft, water-absorbing brush.

Primate researchers examined the "dipping sticks" and concluded they were made specifically for drinking.

The findings are reported in the American Journal of Primatology.

Lead researcher Juan Lapuente, from the Comoe Chimpanzee Conservation Project, in Ivory Coast, explained that using similar brush-tipped sticks to dip into bees' nests for honey was common in chimpanzee populations across Africa.

"But the use of brush-tipped sticks to dip for water is completely new and had never been described before," he told BBC News.

"These chimps use especially long brush tips that they make specifically for water - much longer than those used for honey."

The researchers tested the chimps' drinking sticks in an "absorption experiment", which showed that the particularly long brush-tips provided an advantage.

"The longer the brush, the more water they collect," said Mr Lapuente.

"This technology allows Comoe chimpanzees to obtain water from extremely narrow and deep tree holes that only they - and no other animal - can exploit, which [gives] them a superb adaptive advantage to survive in this dry and unpredictable environment."

Image copyright C Hobaiter
Image caption Previous research on other populations of chimps showed a "culture" of leaf-sponge use. Image by Dr Catherine Hobaiter

This suggests that this particular population of chimpanzees has what the researchers call a "drinking culture" - a custom shared throughout this group of making these special water-dipping sticks to help them through the dry season.

The population belongs to the Western Chimpanzee sub-species, now critically endangered.

Follow Victoria on Twitter

Plant seeds 'adapt to city life'

City life 'boosts bug resistance'

Cityscape
Image caption Exposure to infectious diseases is more likely in cities

People from traditionally urban areas could be genetically better suited to fighting infection, say researchers.

The University of London team looked at how many people carried a specific gene variant known to give them resistance to TB and leprosy.

It was more common in those from areas with a longer history of urbanisation, where the diseases were more likely to have been rife at one point.

This seems to be an elegant example of evolution in action
Dr Ian Barnes,, Researcher

They described the discovery as an example of "evolution in action".

The phenomenon, reported in the journal Evolution, is suggested as an example of so-called "selective pressure" in relation to disease resistance.

It happens because, when a population is exposed to a killer illness, the people who are best placed to pass on their genes to the next generation are those whose genetic make-up helps them fight the infection.

In towns and cities, where people intermingle far more closely, the likelihood of being exposed to infectious disease is theoretically higher.

So, over the centuries, the greater the level of historical exposure, the more likely it is __that these resistance genes will be spread widely among the population.

Disease resistance

The scientists, from University College London and Royal Holloway, part of the University of London, tested this by analysing DNA samples drawn from 17 different human populations living across Europe, Asia and Africa.

The results were cross checked against historical and archaeological data about the date of the first city or urban settlement in each region.

The protective gene variant was found in nearly everyone from the Middle East to India and in parts of Europe where cities have been established for thousands of years, but were less frequent in regions with a shorter history of urbanisation, such as Africa.

Dr Ian Barnes, one of the authors of the research, said: "This seems to be an elegant example of evolution in action.

"It flags up the importance of a very recent aspect of our evolution as a species, the development of cities as a selective force.

"It could also help explain some of the differences we observe in disease resistance around the world."

There are other examples of selective pressure in disease resistance - it has been suggested __that one is the prevalence of the gene defect responsible for the lung disease cystic fibrosis.

Normally, the lethal nature of the condition across history would suggest that people carrying the gene defect were at a distinct evolutionary disadvantage, and their numbers would be fewer.

However, scientists believe that the gene gives carriers an advantage when faced with the cholera toxin - which, in early cities, could have significantly outweighed the disadvantage of some children developing cystic fibrosis.

Overcrowding

Professor Brian Spratt, chair of molecular microbiology at the Imperial College London School of Public Health, said: "Individuals who are more resistant to a pathogen that causes a disease with substantial mortality, such as malaria or TB, will survive better and will contribute more offspring to the next generation. As many of their children will have inherited increased resistance to the pathogen, they also will survive better.

"Thus frequencies of these genetic sequences that provide increased protection to a disease will be far more common in areas where the disease has been killing people for centuries or even millennia than those where the disease has never been endemic.

The same effect should occur for some diseases with populations who have lived for centuries within dense cities because diseases such as cholera and TB will have always been a problem in cities due to overcrowding and poor sanitation, compared to people living nomadic lives."

Urban ecology model 'needs to change'

Satellite image of Moscow (Image: Science Photo Library)
Image caption Current urban expansion differs greatly from historical patterns of growth, say researchers

The way researchers assess urban ecology needs to change in order to take into account the way modern cities are developing, a study suggests.

Scientists in Australia said urban areas were expanding rapidly in a complex "non-linear" way __that existing models failed to capture effectively.

Assessments needed to be modified if ecologists were to get an accurate picture of the environment, they added.

The findings appear in the Trends in Ecology and Evolution journal.

"Our paper aims to raise the awareness __that the ingrained perception in ecology that urbanisation intensity and age - and associated environmental changes - vary in a [uniform manner] from the core to the city fringes, does not apply easily to contemporary patterns of urbanisation," said co-author Cristina Ramalho, a researcher from the University of Western Australia's School of Plant Biology.

"It is necessary, therefore, that ecologists adjust the way they think and conduct research to the reality of contemporary cities."

'Dramatic impacts'

She explained that, historically, cities grew slowly in a relatively compact manner, through progressive rings of urban development.

However, Ms Ramalho added, contemporary patterns of expansion were "markedly different".

"Cities are growing very rapidly, they are increasingly expansive and dispersed, sprawling in... spider-like configurations across large distances, and embedding fragments of other land uses in the rapidly changing landscape," she said.

Image caption Existing assessment models are based on historical but outdated urbanisation patterns, they explained

Ecologically, this type of expansion was having "dramatic impacts".

"It is driving the large-scale loss and fragmentation of natural and semi-natural habitats in several countries and cities worldwide," she told BBC News.

"In countries such as the US and Australia, urbanisation is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss."

The researchers said current models used by ecologists to assess urbanisation looked at this issue in a "rather simplified" way - such as using broad categories, including urban, suburban and rural.

Ms Ramalho explained why this needed to be updated: "If contemporary cities expand in a complex, non-linear manner, then the assumption that urbanisation intensity and age can be assessed based on a site's position along a linear urban-to-rural gradient can be misleading."

She added that the measures also failed to adequately capture the effects of important drivers, such as landscape fragmentation and disturbances. She also said that the changing nature of urbanising landscapes were not reflected in systems that did not have a temporal dimension.

Sharper focus

The researchers suggested, as an alternative, that the impacts of an urbanising landscape should be assessed by looking at the changing attributes of a particular area, or the characteristics of a neighbouring landscape.

"Ecologists should move beyond the use of aggregated urbanisation measures and consider a comprehensive set of driving factors selected based on the characteristics of the study area and ecological question of interest," Ms Ramalho said.

"Ecologists should also consider the temporal dynamics of landscape change, and the effects of land-use history and time lags on biodiversity responses to on-going environmental change."

By adopting such an approach would provide information that would help policymakers and planners, she added.

"A temporal perspective considering the fragmentation and land-use history can provide insight into the remnants environmental conditions and conservation value and, therefore, be used in prioritising conservation.

"Priorities could be, for instance, those remnants without significant land-use legacies and those that were recently fragmented."

Endless black holes, ice domes on Mars, and other top images of the week

Huge Antarctic iceberg poised to break away

ice shelf break up Image copyright Adrian Luckman
Image caption A huge iceberg, a quarter the size of Wales, is poised to break off from the Larsen C ice shelf

An iceberg expected to be one of the 10 largest ever recorded is ready to break away from Antarctica, scientists say.

A long-running rift in the Larson C ice shelf grew suddenly in December and now just 20km of ice is keeping the 5,000 sq km piece from floating away.

Larsen C is the most northern major ice shelf in Antarctica.

Researchers based in Swansea say the loss of a piece a quarter of the size of Wales will leave the whole shelf vulnerable to future break-up.

Larsen C is about 350m thick and floats on the seas at the edge of West Antarctica, holding back the flow of glaciers __that feed into it.

Researchers have been tracking the rift in Larsen C for many years, watching it with some trepidation after the collapse of Larsen A ice shelf in 1995 and the sudden break-up of the Larsen B shelf in 2002.

Last year, researchers from the UK's Project Midas reported __that the Larsen C rift was growing fast.

But in December the speed of the rift went into overdrive, growing by a further 18km in just a couple of weeks. What will become a massive iceberg now hangs on to the shelf by a thread just 20km long.

Image copyright NASA
Image caption The rift is about 100m wide but is estimated to be half a kilometre deep
Image copyright NASA
Image caption Images taken in November last year show the length of the rift

"If it doesn't go in the next few months, I'll be amazed," project leader Prof Adrian Luckman, from Swansea University, told BBC News.

"There hasn't been enough cloud-free Landsat images but we've managed to combine a pair of Esa Sentinel-1 radar images to notice this extension, and it's so close to calving that I think it's inevitable."

Prof Luckman says the area that will break off will be about 5,000 sq km, a size he says that would put the iceberg among the top 10 biggest that have been recorded.

The researchers say that this is a geographical and not a climate event. The rift has been present for decades, they say, but it has punched through at this particular time.

It is believed that climate warming has brought forward the likely separation of the iceberg but the scientists say they have no direct evidence to support this.

However, they are concerned about how any break-off will impact the rest of the ice shelf, given that its neighbour, Larsen B, disintegrated spectacularly in 2002 following a similar large calving event.

Image copyright SPL
Image caption The collapse of the Larsen B ice shelf which occurred in 2002 followed on from a large rift calving event

"We are convinced, although others are not, that the remaining ice shelf will be less stable than the present one," said Prof Luckman.

"We would expect in the ensuing months to years further calving events, and maybe an eventual collapse - but it's a very hard thing to predict, and our models say it will be less stable; not that it will immediately collapse or anything like that."

As it floats on the sea, the resulting iceberg from the shelf will not raise sea levels. But if the shelf breaks up even more, it could result in glaciers that flow off the land behind it to speed up their passage towards the ocean. This non-floating ice would have an impact on sea levels.

According to estimates, if all the ice that the Larsen C shelf currently holds back entered the sea, global waters would rise by 10cm.

All that is very much in the future. There are few certainties right now apart from an imminent change to the outline of Antarctica's icy coast.

"The eventual consequences might be the ice shelf collapsing in years to decades," said Prof Luckman,

"Even the sea level contribution of this area is not on anybody's radar; it's just a big geographical event that will change the landscape there."

Follow Matt on Twitter and on Facebook

Law needed to limit Brexit's environmental impact, say MPs

wildlife Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption MPs are concerned __that existing environmental safeguards may be weakened by Brexit

Brexit poses a huge risk to UK wildlife and habitats and a new environmental law will be needed, MPs have said.

Even where EU law is incorporated into the UK's legal framework there could still be problems, they warn.

The House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee also says farmers are facing significant threats including loss of income and tariffs on exports.

The government says it is committed to safeguarding and improving existing environmental protection.

Problems with incorporation

Whether it is the cleanliness of the UK's beaches, pollution control or the protection of species, much of the UK's environmental and wildlife legislation is rooted in EU directives.

The government has said __that it will introduce a "Great Repeal Bill" that will incorporate many of these regulations into UK law when Britain leaves the union.

However, Environment Secretary Andrea Leadsom admitted that about one third of the current environmental rules would be difficult to transpose into UK law, saying "there will be work to do to ensure we can continue to make these measures work once we leave the EU".

For instance, the EU's Birds and Habitats Directives have given much greater protection for wild birds and special areas of conservation than domestic UK legislation - but these will no longer apply in their current form in UK law even if Britain remains in the Single Market.

The cross party Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) says that to ensure that there is no weakening, a new environmental protection act should be passed during the Article 50 negotiations.

"European law protects huge amounts of the UK's environment, farming and countryside," Mary Creagh, chair of the committee, told BBC News.

"The process of leaving the EU presents a huge risk to all of those protections which is why in our report we're calling for new environmental protection act so that when we leave the European Union we are no worse off protected than we are at the moment."

Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption EU environmental legislation underpins many safeguards for UK wildlife

And it suggests incorporating EU law into the UK legal framework could result in these protections becoming so-called "zombie" laws, which are no longer updated and could be easily eroded with minimal parliamentary scrutiny.

Environmental campaigners agreed that this was a significant concern.

"The Great Repeal Bill must contain democratic safeguards to make sure that no significant amendment to the scope or purpose of EU environmental legislation can be made without being subject to full parliamentary scrutiny," said Sam Lowe from Friends of the Earth.

"No one voted to 'take back control' for the UK Parliament, only to hand it straight over to a minister, brandishing a red pen, with the power to delete vital nature protections on a whim."

The report also focuses on the impact of Brexit on farming, pointing out that the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) makes up between 50-60% of some farm incomes. The MPs say they have a number of worries about the future of farming.

"UK farming faces significant risks - from a loss of subsidies and tariffs on farm exports, to increased competition from countries with weaker food, animal welfare and environmental standards," said Mary Creagh.

"The government must not trade away these key protections as we leave the EU. It should also give clarity over any future farm subsidies."

Many environmental campaigners believe that Brexit represents a very good opportunity for reforming the EU farming policy that they say has been one of the biggest drivers of environmental decline in the UK and other parts of Europe.

Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption The future of UK farming outside the EU is also worrying MPs on the Committee

"There needs to be substantial reform - if a farmer is holding water on his field upstream that is helping to prevent downstream flooding, that's not a commercial activity for a farmer but that's where public subsidy is warranted," said Trevor Hutchings from WWF-UK.

"There's a huge opportunity here to have a strong and thriving farming community, environment as well as servicing a public good."

Responding to the report the government pointed out that the UK is a signatory of international wildlife protection conventions, such as Ramsar and Bern, that are independent of EU membership.

A spokesperson said: "The UK has a long history of wildlife and environmental protection and we are committed to safeguarding and improving these, securing the best deal for Britain as we leave the EU."

Follow Matt on Twitter and on Facebook

Science & Environment

Have we invented a long-distance jetpack yet?

Martin Aircraft in New Zealand built the prototype that’s closest to allowing you to jet to work. A fan-propelled, rotary-­engine-powered jetpack with 200 horsepower, the Martin Jetpack (not pictured) keeps steady altitude even if riders’ hands leave the controls for a sip of coffee. “It’s ridiculously easy to fly,” says Mike Read, VP of sales at Martin. Its range? Thirty miles. Martin plans for the military to test it before consumers whiz it around.

Want to know if your fantasy invention could become a reality? Tweet @PopSci or tell us on Facebook. This question came from Popular Science reader Stuart Harwood via Facebook.

This article was originally published in the January/February 2017 issue of Popular Science, under the title “I Wish Someone Would Invent...A Long-Distance Jetpack.”